LogoLogo
About Us
  • Executive Summary
  • Why Myosin
    • Our Mission & Values
    • How it Works
    • The Bigger Vision
  • Building Web3 Growth Tools
    • Myosin Ecosystem
    • Decentralizing Ad Servers
    • On-Chain Media Spend
    • Using Interactive Fraud Proofs to Detect Fraudulent Activity
    • Web3 Affiliate Network
    • IRL NFT Scavenger Hunts
    • On-Chain Reputation Score
  • $MYO Tokenomics
    • Overview
    • Revenue Streams
    • Demand and Supply
    • Treasury Holdings
    • Bonding Curve
    • Token Supply & Distribution
    • Staking Rewards
  • Token Utility
    • Membership & Governance
    • Access to Projects
    • Bounties
  • Governance & Regulations
    • Governance
    • Regulatory Hurdles Cleared
  • Conclusion
    • Overview
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Governance & Regulations

Governance

PreviousBountiesNextRegulatory Hurdles Cleared

Last updated 3 years ago

Sybil attacks have been a significant issue with blockchains and cryptocurrencies. are security threats in which an attacker tries to overtake the system by creating pseudonymous entities and voting to overwhelm the system.

To avoid any security issues and secure the platform, we use . This voting mechanism prevents the Dominance of Larger Token Holders.

With Quadratic voting, each vote is associated with a weightage designed in order to avoid a majority takeover by a single entity.

For example, if a member has more than a majority stake (51% and above), he might overwhelm all other members due to majority voting power. In quadratic voting, their voting power will be limited (say, to 41%) so that they are reduced to a minority, allowing the process to stay decentralized.

Sybil attacks
quadratic voting